Compare GDP per capita between OECD and non-OECD high-income countries
The question
901809Compare GDP per capita between OECD and non-OECD high-income countries
Exact submitted task and declared adaptations
Compare GDP per capita between OECD and non-OECD high-income countries
Task conventions: Use the frozen country polygons and World Bank NY.GDP.PCAP.CD 2023 column, in current USD per capita. These are country-level indicators, not a subnational surface or a new regional aggregation. Join the supplied ISO_A3 to Country Code exactly. Nonmatching identifiers and missing measurements remain unknown; do not guess them or substitute another year. Retain every original country feature in the declared geography and its benchmark_row_id, including unknowns. No data must have a distinct map category, not zero. Create a quantitative choropleth with five quantile classes (fewer only if tied values collapse breaks), a visible legend with numeric bounds and units, and a neutral No data category. Values equal to a class break enter the upper class. Preserve negative and genuine zero values. This fixed classification and year are disclosed evaluation conventions; do not retrieve live replacements. Count original boundary features, not deduplicated sovereign states; preserve all source rows that meet the declared geography. Country-code sentinels such as -99 remain unmatched. Geography is fixed to original country features with INCOME_GRP in ["1. High income: OECD", "2. High income: nonOECD"]; retain all matching source geometries, and no others. Classification is calculated only over this geography. Membership reflects this disclosed benchmark edition, not current organization membership. Also compare unweighted means of known original country features by these fixed INCOME_GRP groups: {"OECD": ["1. High income: OECD"], "non_OECD": ["2. High income: nonOECD"]}. Do not treat missing values as zero. These are country comparisons, not basin-clipped or population-weighted estimates.
Add the resulting quantitative country layer to the map and retain an inspectable data artifact containing the original country geometry, benchmark_row_id, numeric value and class. End with one fenced JSON object: {count: countries with a known numeric value, unknown_count: countries without one, coverage_note: string, selection: {collectionId, itemId, assetKey}, value_field: numeric_column_name, class_field: classification_column_name, map_layer_id: delivered_layer_id}. The artifact must include known AND unknown countries, not only the known subset. Explain the year, units, key limitations and legend in the final response. Include a metrics object in the final JSON with group-name keys and their numeric means (or null if no known members), and explain the comparison.
Delivery format: provide the answer object with all fields specified above as final_response on assess_result, alongside the inspected final artifact_refs. This replaces the JSON-code-block formatting requirement above. Blue attaches your explicit selection to the accepted final answer. Finish with a concise ordinary-language answer agreeing with that selected result; do not duplicate the JSON in chat.
Supplied immutable inputs:
[
{
"name": "World Bank country boundaries",
"edition": "GeoBenchX harmonized names",
"units": {},
"collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
"itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
"assetKey": "data"
},
{
"name": "GDP per capita",
"edition": "Frozen WDI; current US dollars by year",
"units": {
"2023": "current USD per capita",
"2020": "current USD per capita",
"2022": "current USD per capita"
},
"collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
"itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
"assetKey": "data"
}
]Outcome & verification
Independent artifact and delivery checks passed.
- Duration
- 13m 20s
- Recorded Blue tool calls
- 41
- Total tokens
- 2,326,946
- Model cost
- Not recorded
- Application revision
- d50497ea9084f29c91b05406688f87035df98d8a
- Release
- terra-geobenchx-v1
Recorded final answer
Independent checks
These checks are separate from the agent's own assessment. A successful job or an assertion of success is not enough to pass.
- Expected count
- 54
- Reported count
- 54
- Computation verified
- Yes
- Answer fulfilled
- Yes
Full grading and rubric record
{
"expectedCount": 54,
"actualCount": 54,
"expectedMetrics": {
"OECD": 53000.95120822906,
"non_OECD": 36194.99632695085
},
"actualMetrics": {
"OECD": 53000.95120822907,
"non_OECD": 36194.996326950844
},
"computationCorrect": true,
"answerFulfilled": true,
"adjudication": null,
"qualification": null,
"reasons": []
}Recorded investigation findings
The agent's reported hypotheses and assessments, retained as evidence of its process—not independent proof that the answer is correct. Failed calls retain their requested verdict, not an accepted assessment.
run_trial · completed
Does the full fixed high-income geography support the required exact GDP join, quantile choropleth, and OECD versus non-OECD mean comparison without dropping unknown country rows?
assess_trial · completed · assessment: sufficient
The full fixed geography trial answered the method question. Filtering by the two requested INCOME_GRP values returned 85 original country features. The exact left join on ISO_A3 to Country Code preserved all 85 rows, matched 73 features, left 12 unmatched input features, and produced 54 known 2023 GDP per capita values with 31 unknown values after also counting missing measurements. The classification produced five quantile classes plus class 0 for No data, with class counts 11, 11, 10, 9, 13 and 31 No data. The grouped means were 53000.95120822907 current USD per capita for OECD and 36194.996326950844 for non-OECD using known values only.
assess_result · completed · assessment: sufficient
The final comparison table is sufficient. OECD has the higher unweighted mean 2023 GDP per capita at 53000.95120822907 current USD per capita versus 36194.996326950844 for non-OECD. The comparison preserves original feature counts and excludes unknown GDP values from the means.
assess_result · failed · requested assessment: sufficient
The final result is sufficient. The delivered country layer retains all 85 fixed benchmark high-income country features with original geometry and benchmark_row_id, joins the frozen World Bank NY.GDP.PCAP.CD 2023 values by exact ISO_A3 to Country Code, and keeps 31 unknown values in a distinct No data class rather than zero. The choropleth uses five quantile classes with breaks at 28247.022632872442, 34711.08078293472, 50330.593046729635 and 62536.7320298151 current USD per capita, and the map layer is available on the current map. The paired comparison shows a higher unweighted mean for OECD (53000.95120822907) than for non-OECD (36194.996326950844).
assess_result · completed · assessment: sufficient
The final result is sufficient. The delivered country layer retains all 85 fixed benchmark high-income country features with original geometry and benchmark_row_id, joins the frozen World Bank NY.GDP.PCAP.CD 2023 values by exact ISO_A3 to Country Code, and keeps 31 unknown values in a distinct No data class rather than zero. The choropleth uses five quantile classes with breaks at 28247.022632872442, 34711.08078293472, 50330.593046729635 and 62536.7320298151 current USD per capita, and the map layer is available on the current map. The paired comparison shows a higher unweighted mean for OECD (53000.95120822907) than for non-OECD (36194.996326950844).
Recorded workflow
- 01
Classify 2023 GDP per capita
Recorded vector-classify · succeeded
- 02
Supplied country boundaries
Recorded source · succeeded
- 03
2023 GDP per capita by benchmark high-income country
Recorded output · succeeded
- 04
OECD versus non-OECD mean GDP per capita
Recorded output · succeeded
- 05
Keep fixed high-income groups
Recorded vector-filter · succeeded
- 06
Supplied GDP table
Recorded source · succeeded
- 07
Compare group means
Recorded table-group-statistics · succeeded
- 08
Join 2023 GDP values
Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded
- 09
Classify 2023 GDP per capita
Recorded vector-classify · succeeded
- 10
Supplied country boundaries
Recorded source · succeeded
- 11
Keep fixed high-income groups
Recorded vector-filter · succeeded
- 12
Supplied GDP table
Recorded source · succeeded
- 13
Compare group means
Recorded table-group-statistics · succeeded
- 14
Join 2023 GDP values
Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded
- 15
Keep fixed high-income groups
Recorded output · succeeded
- 16
Join 2023 GDP values
Recorded output · succeeded
- 17
Classify 2023 GDP per capita
Recorded output · succeeded
- 18
Classify 2023 GDP per capita
Recorded output · succeeded
- 19
Compare group means
Recorded output · succeeded
- 20
Compare group means
Recorded output · succeeded
Activity
Recorded actionsRecorded observable actions only, not private reasoning. Raw payloads, geometry, private links and credentials are omitted; full evidence is retained privately. Activity/workflow lists bounded at 500 entries.
Progress update
I’m checking the supplied country boundaries and frozen GDP table first, then I’ll test the exact join and classing so the final layer keeps every original country row, including unknowns.
get_analysis
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I found no saved work for this request yet. Now I’m inspecting the supplied boundary and GDP snapshots so I can confirm the exact fields, selection, and output shape before I build the join.
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
get_item
Recorded tool call · completed
get_item
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I confirmed both are fixed one-item snapshots. Next I’m reading the actual file schemas and a few rows so I can use the exact field names and not guess any joins or year columns.
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · failed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · failed
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I’ve got the exact fields now. I’m checking one end-to-end private trial over the full fixed geography, because this dataset is small enough to test the real join, the quantile classes, and the group means in one slice before I save the production draft.
update_analysis_brief
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
run_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The private full-scope test finished successfully. I confirmed the fixed geography has 85 original country features, the exact join keeps unknowns, and the group means can be computed from known 2023 values only. I’m checking the saved trial outputs now, then I’ll save the production draft from that tested method and add the final layer to the map.
get_trial_report
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I confirmed the tested method does what you asked: 85 fixed benchmark country features are kept, 54 have known 2023 GDP per capita, 31 stay unknown, and the two group means are available. I’m saving that exact tested method as the final production draft now so I can run it, inspect the delivered artifact, and add the map layer.
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
assess_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The method is now tested. I’m refreshing the saved brief so it reflects what’s confirmed already, then I’ll validate the final workflow from that tested computation.
update_analysis_brief
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I’ve finished the method check. Now I’m saving the exact tested computation as the final workflow draft, with the fixed join, geography, classes, and comparison rules locked to your benchmark conventions.
propose_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
execute_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_workflow_results
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I’ve got the finished outputs and the map layer receipt. I’m doing one final bounded inspection of the delivered country artifact, the class legend, and the two-row comparison table so the accepted result points to the exact final items.
list_map_layers
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I’m just collecting the final inspection receipts now: the country layer rows and class field, the class legend summary, and the two-row mean table. Then I can lock the result object to the exact delivered map layer and table.
Progress update
I’ve verified the finished map layer, the 2023 value field, the class field, the legend breaks, and the two-row mean table. I’m recording the final accepted result now against the exact delivered artifacts.
assess_result
Recorded tool call · completed
assess_result
Recorded tool call · failed
Progress update
I hit a result-check formatting issue, not a data problem. I’m resubmitting the final assessment with the exact acceptance-condition labels Blue requires.
assess_result
Recorded tool call · completed