Show labor force distribution in Arctic Circle countries
The question
258248Show labor force distribution in Arctic Circle countries
Exact submitted task and declared adaptations
Show labor force distribution in Arctic Circle countries
Task conventions: Use the frozen country polygons and World Bank SL.TLF.TOTL.IN 2023 column, in people. These are country-level indicators, not a subnational surface or a new regional aggregation. Join the supplied ISO_A3 to Country Code exactly. Nonmatching identifiers and missing measurements remain unknown; do not guess them or substitute another year. Retain every original country feature in the declared geography and its benchmark_row_id, including unknowns. No data must have a distinct map category, not zero. Create a quantitative choropleth with five quantile classes (fewer only if tied values collapse breaks), a visible legend with numeric bounds and units, and a neutral No data category. Values equal to a class break enter the upper class. Preserve negative and genuine zero values. This fixed classification and year are disclosed evaluation conventions; do not retrieve live replacements. Count original boundary features, not deduplicated sovereign states; preserve all source rows that meet the declared geography. Country-code sentinels such as -99 remain unmatched. Geography is fixed to original country features with NAME_EN in ["Canada", "Denmark", "Finland", "Iceland", "Norway", "Russian Federation", "Sweden", "United States"]; retain all matching source geometries, and no others. Classification is calculated only over this geography. Membership reflects this disclosed benchmark edition, not current organization membership.
Add the resulting quantitative country layer to the map and retain an inspectable data artifact containing the original country geometry, benchmark_row_id, numeric value and class. End with one fenced JSON object: {count: countries with a known numeric value, unknown_count: countries without one, coverage_note: string, selection: {collectionId, itemId, assetKey}, value_field: numeric_column_name, class_field: classification_column_name, map_layer_id: delivered_layer_id}. The artifact must include known AND unknown countries, not only the known subset. Explain the year, units, key limitations and legend in the final response.
Delivery format: provide the answer object with all fields specified above as final_response on assess_result, alongside the inspected final artifact_refs. This replaces the JSON-code-block formatting requirement above. Blue attaches your explicit selection to the accepted final answer. Finish with a concise ordinary-language answer agreeing with that selected result; do not duplicate the JSON in chat.
Supplied immutable inputs:
[
{
"name": "World Bank country boundaries",
"edition": "GeoBenchX harmonized names",
"units": {},
"collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
"itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
"assetKey": "data"
},
{
"name": "World Bank SL.TLF.TOTL.IN",
"edition": "Frozen GeoBenchX World Development Indicators; use 2023",
"units": {
"2023": "people"
},
"collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
"itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
"assetKey": "data"
}
]Outcome & verification
Independent artifact and delivery checks passed.
- Duration
- 15m 21s
- Recorded Blue tool calls
- 35
- Total tokens
- 1,674,167
- Model cost
- Not recorded
- Application revision
- d50497ea9084f29c91b05406688f87035df98d8a
- Release
- terra-geobenchx-v1
Recorded final answer
Independent checks
These checks are separate from the agent's own assessment. A successful job or an assertion of success is not enough to pass.
- Expected count
- 7
- Reported count
- 7
- Computation verified
- Yes
- Answer fulfilled
- Yes
Full grading and rubric record
{
"expectedCount": 7,
"actualCount": 7,
"expectedMetrics": null,
"actualMetrics": null,
"computationCorrect": true,
"answerFulfilled": true,
"adjudication": null,
"qualification": null,
"reasons": []
}Recorded investigation findings
The agent's reported hypotheses and assessments, retained as evidence of its process—not independent proof that the answer is correct. Failed calls retain their requested verdict, not an accepted assessment.
run_trial · completed
Do the supplied benchmark boundaries and frozen World Bank labor-force table support the required exact country-code join and quantile choropleth for the fixed Arctic-country geography without dropping unmatched rows?
assess_trial · completed · assessment: sufficient
The full-scope trial answered the method question. Filtering the supplied benchmark boundaries by the eight listed NAME_EN values retained 8 original country features. The exact left join from ISO_A3 to Country Code preserved all 8 features, matched 7, and left 1 unmatched feature with ISO_A3='-99' as unknown. Quantile classification on the frozen 2023 field kept all 8 rows together, assigned labor_force_class 0 to the unknown row, and produced five numeric classes across the 7 known values.
assess_result · completed · assessment: sufficient
The delivered map artifact contains 8 fixed benchmark country features and no extras. It preserves original geometry and benchmark_row_id, uses the frozen 2023 labor-force field in people, and keeps all rows together after the exact ISO_A3 to Country Code left join. Seven countries have known values and one Norway feature remains No data because its supplied ISO_A3 is the sentinel -99. The final classifier summary reports five quantile classes over 7 known values, one No data row, and breaks at 2,939,754.6; 4,237,804.2; 15,596,385.0; and 62,348,298.6 people. The final deliverable is added to the map as layer [resource id withheld].
Recorded workflow
- 01
Classify 2023 labor force values
Recorded vector-classify · succeeded
- 02
Benchmark country boundaries
Recorded source · succeeded
- 03
Arctic countries labor force choropleth (2023)
Recorded output · succeeded
- 04
Join frozen 2023 labor force values
Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded
- 05
Frozen World Bank labor force table
Recorded source · succeeded
- 06
Select fixed Arctic-country features
Recorded vector-filter · succeeded
- 07
Classify 2023 labor force values
Recorded vector-classify · succeeded
- 08
Benchmark country boundaries
Recorded source · succeeded
- 09
Join frozen 2023 labor force values
Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded
- 10
Frozen World Bank labor force table
Recorded source · succeeded
- 11
Select fixed Arctic-country features
Recorded vector-filter · succeeded
- 12
Join frozen 2023 labor force values
Recorded output · succeeded
- 13
Classify 2023 labor force values
Recorded output · succeeded
Activity
Recorded actionsRecorded observable actions only, not private reasoning. Raw payloads, geometry, private links and credentials are omitted; full evidence is retained privately. Activity/workflow lists bounded at 500 entries.
Progress update
I’ll inspect the supplied boundary and indicator files, test the exact join and quantile classification on the fixed Arctic-country geography, then save and run the map workflow.
get_analysis
Recorded tool call · completed
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I found the exact frozen benchmark inputs. Next I’m checking their field names and sample rows so I can test the join and the fixed 2023 classification exactly as requested.
get_item
Recorded tool call · completed
get_item
Recorded tool call · completed
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
update_analysis_brief
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I have the exact fields now: `NAME_EN`, `ISO_A3`, `benchmark_row_id`, `Country Code`, and `2023`. I’m running a small end-to-end test to confirm the selected row count, unmatched codes, and the quantile classes before I save the full map workflow.
run_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The test worked at full requested scope: 8 boundary rows were kept, 7 matched the frozen 2023 table, and 1 stayed unknown because its `ISO_A3` is the sentinel `-99`. I’m checking the class breaks and preview now, then I’ll save and run the final map workflow from this tested method.
get_trial_report
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The join and classification trial succeeded. I’m reading the exact country rows and class values now so I can lock the tested method into the final workflow and verify the delivered map layer.
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
assess_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The method is confirmed. I’m saving that exact tested computation as the production workflow now, with the final deliverable bound to the requested map result.
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
propose_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I found one bookkeeping issue, not a data problem: the saved contract scope didn’t match the copied trial scope. I’m correcting that exact scope field and revalidating the same tested workflow now.
propose_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
execute_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_workflow_results
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I already have the final artifact ID and map layer ID. I’m reading the delivered rows and the classifier summary now so I can confirm the known/unknown counts and the legend bounds before I record the final result.
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I have the final classifier summary and map binding. I’m pulling the delivered country rows and preview one more time so the final assessment cites the exact output, not just the workflow receipt.
update_analysis_brief
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I’ve verified the delivered layer, artifact rows, class counts, and legend breaks. I’m refreshing the brief to remove stale planning notes, then I’ll record the final accepted result object.
assess_result
Recorded tool call · completed