Visualize net migration patterns worldwide
The question
250712Visualize net migration patterns worldwide.
Exact submitted task and declared adaptations
Visualize net migration patterns worldwide.
Task conventions: Use the frozen country polygons and World Bank SM.POP.NETM 2023 column, in people (net migration). These are country-level indicators, not a subnational surface or a new regional aggregation. Join the supplied ISO_A3 to Country Code exactly. Nonmatching identifiers and missing measurements remain unknown; do not guess them or substitute another year. Retain every original country feature and benchmark_row_id, including unknowns. No data must have a distinct map category, not zero. Create a quantitative choropleth with five quantile classes (fewer only if tied values collapse breaks), a visible legend with numeric bounds and units, and a neutral No data category. Values equal to a class break enter the upper class. Preserve negative and genuine zero values. This fixed classification and year are disclosed evaluation conventions; do not retrieve live replacements.
Add the resulting quantitative country layer to the map and retain an inspectable data artifact containing the original country geometry, benchmark_row_id, numeric value and class. End with one fenced JSON object: {count: countries with a known numeric value, unknown_count: countries without one, coverage_note: string, selection: {collectionId, itemId, assetKey}, value_field: numeric_column_name, class_field: classification_column_name, map_layer_id: delivered_layer_id}. The artifact must include known AND unknown countries, not only the known subset. Explain the year, units, key limitations and legend in the final response.
Delivery format: provide the answer object with all fields specified above as final_response on assess_result, alongside the inspected final artifact_refs. This replaces the JSON-code-block formatting requirement above. Blue attaches your explicit selection to the accepted final answer. Finish with a concise ordinary-language answer agreeing with that selected result; do not duplicate the JSON in chat.
Supplied immutable inputs:
[
{
"name": "World Bank country boundaries",
"edition": "GeoBenchX harmonized names",
"units": {},
"collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
"itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
"assetKey": "data"
},
{
"name": "Net migration, World Development Indicators",
"edition": "2024-11-13 snapshot; use 2023",
"units": {
"2023": "people (net migration)"
},
"collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
"itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
"assetKey": "data"
}
]Outcome & verification
Independent artifact and delivery checks passed.
- Duration
- 17m 45s
- Recorded Blue tool calls
- 58
- Total tokens
- 2,326,112
- Model cost
- Not recorded
- Application revision
- d50497ea9084f29c91b05406688f87035df98d8a
- Release
- terra-geobenchx-v1
Recorded final answer
Independent checks
These checks are separate from the agent's own assessment. A successful job or an assertion of success is not enough to pass.
- Expected count
- 217
- Reported count
- 217
- Computation verified
- Yes
- Answer fulfilled
- Yes
Full grading and rubric record
{
"expectedCount": 217,
"actualCount": 217,
"expectedMetrics": null,
"actualMetrics": null,
"computationCorrect": true,
"answerFulfilled": true,
"adjudication": null,
"qualification": null,
"reasons": []
}Recorded investigation findings
The agent's reported hypotheses and assessments, retained as evidence of its process—not independent proof that the answer is correct. Failed calls retain their requested verdict, not an accepted assessment.
run_trial · completed
Do the supplied source files expose the exact fields needed for the required join and final artifact?
assess_trial · completed · assessment: sufficient
The supplied country boundary file exposes ISO_A3 and benchmark_row_id. The supplied indicator table exposes Country Code and a numeric 2023 field for SM.POP.NETM. My earlier expectation that the indicator table also needed benchmark_row_id was incorrect; the task only requires retaining benchmark_row_id from the original country features, so the available fields are sufficient for the required exact join and final artifact.
run_trial · completed
Does an exact global left join from ISO_A3 to Country Code retain every supplied country feature and produce the required 2023 net migration quantile choropleth with unknown countries kept as No data?
assess_trial · completed · assessment: sufficient
The exact global left join retained all 251 supplied country features and their benchmark_row_id values. It produced 217 countries with a known numeric 2023 value and 34 countries with unknown 2023 after exact ISO_A3 to Country Code matching. The classified output retained all 251 features, used five quantile classes for known values, kept unknown countries in class 0, and preserved genuine zero values as data rather than No data. The generated summary reported breaks at -15237.4, -3173.4, -21.6, and 3950.0 people, with class counts 34 No data, then 44, 43, 43, 43, and 44 across classes 1 to 5.
assess_result · completed · assessment: sufficient
The worldwide 2023 net migration choropleth is on the map as layer `Country net migration 2023` (layer `[resource id withheld]`). The delivered artifact retains all 251 supplied country features and benchmark_row_id values, with 217 known 2023 net migration values and 34 No data features after the exact ISO_A3 to Country Code join. The delivered summary reports five quantile classes for known values with breaks at -15237.4, -3173.4, -21.6, and 3950.0 people (net migration), plus class 0 for No data. Genuine zero values remain valid data and are not mapped as No data. Sources: Benchmark fixture · World Bank country boundaries (provider: Blue; immutable supplied input; retrieved 2026-10-07) and Benchmark fixture · Net migration, World Development Indicators, 2024-11-13 snapshot using 2023 (provider: Blue hosting archived World Bank WDI input; retrieved 2026-10-07).
Recorded workflow
- 01
Quantile choropleth for 2023 net migration
Recorded vector-classify · succeeded
- 02
Supplied country polygons
Recorded source · succeeded
- 03
Country net migration 2023
Recorded output · succeeded
- 04
Join 2023 net migration to countries
Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded
- 05
Supplied net migration table
Recorded source · succeeded
- 06
Quantile choropleth for 2023 net migration
Recorded vector-classify · succeeded
- 07
Supplied country polygons
Recorded source · succeeded
- 08
Join 2023 net migration to countries
Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded
- 09
Supplied net migration table
Recorded source · succeeded
- 10
Join 2023 net migration to countries
Recorded output · succeeded
- 11
Quantile choropleth for 2023 net migration
Recorded output · succeeded
- 12
Quantile choropleth for 2023 net migration
Recorded output · succeeded
- 13
Supplied country polygons
Recorded source · succeeded
- 14
Supplied migration table
Recorded source · succeeded
- 15
Supplied country polygons
Recorded output · succeeded
- 16
Supplied migration table
Recorded output · succeeded
Activity
Recorded actionsRecorded observable actions only, not private reasoning. Raw payloads, geometry, private links and credentials are omitted; full evidence is retained privately. Activity/workflow lists bounded at 500 entries.
Progress update
I’m checking the retained analysis and the supplied country and indicator data first, then I’ll test the exact join and five-quantile choropleth method before building the final map layer.
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
get_analysis
Recorded tool call · completed
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I found the two supplied immutable inputs. Next I’m inspecting their actual fields and a small sample so I can join `ISO_A3` to `Country Code` exactly, keep all countries, and classify only the 2023 numeric values.
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I’ve identified the two processors I need: a left attribute join and a quantitative vector classifier. The remaining uncertainty is the exact field names and whether the join keeps every country with unknowns preserved, so I’m setting up a small private trial that reaches the final country choropleth output and will inspect the joined rows and classing result directly.
update_analysis_brief
Recorded tool call · completed
run_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The first inspection succeeded. I confirmed the boundary file has `ISO_A3` and `benchmark_row_id`, and the indicator file has `Country Code` plus yearly numeric fields. I’m now checking the exact 2023 column name and then I’ll run one end-to-end trial of the exact left join and quantile choropleth before saving the final workflow.
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
get_trial_report
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The source check is already useful: the boundary file has `ISO_A3`, and the indicator file has `Country Code` and yearly fields through 2019 in the summary, so I’m verifying the exact 2023 column directly from the inspected schema and sample rows before I join and classify.
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I confirmed the indicator schema includes a `2023` numeric field. One sample-row request failed because I asked for `benchmark_row_id` on the indicator table, which it does not have. That is not a data gap for this task, because only the original country features need their `benchmark_row_id` retained. I’m correcting that field request now, then I’ll run the exact left join and quantile classification trial.
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
assess_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The schema check is done. I’ve corrected the mistaken field request, and I’m pulling a few indicator rows now so I can confirm the 2023 values before running the full worldwide join-and-classify test.
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
run_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The full trial already shows the key result: all 251 country features were retained, 217 have known 2023 values, and 34 stayed unknown. I’m doing one last spot-check on unknown and zero rows, then I’ll save and run the final map workflow so I can add the verified choropleth layer to your map.
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I’ve confirmed the key edge cases too: the final trial kept 34 unknown countries in class `0` as No data, and genuine `2023 = 0` countries were kept as data in class `4`, not No data. I’m pulling the classified preview and the proposal schema now so I can save the tested method exactly and publish the final layer.
Progress update
The global choropleth preview is ready and the spot checks passed: 251 total country features, 217 known values, 34 No data, and valid zero values stayed in an ordinary quantile class. I’m now saving the tested workflow exactly, then I’ll execute it and add the verified layer to the map.
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
update_analysis_brief
Recorded tool call · completed
assess_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The tested method is ready to save exactly as the final workflow: exact left join on the fixed codes, one 2023 value field, five quantile classes, and a separate No data class. I’m saving that now with the current limitations so I can run it unchanged and add the final layer.
propose_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
execute_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The final workflow is saved and validated against the tested computation with no blocking issues. I’m executing that unchanged workflow now, then I’ll inspect its delivered artifact, add the verified choropleth layer to your map, and record the final answer object.
inspect_workflow_results
Recorded tool call · completed
list_map_layers
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The saved workflow appears to have completed, so I’m inspecting its delivered output directly now. After that I’ll bind the verified country layer to the map and record the final result with the exact delivered artifact.
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I’ve already confirmed the final map layer and the delivered counts. I’m retrieving the last zero-value row receipt and the final-assessment schema now so I can record the exact answer object on the delivered artifact rather than a draft.
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I have the delivered artifact, the delivered summary, the final map layer ID, and the edge-case checks for unknowns and genuine zeros. I’m recording the final result now against the actual delivered layer and artifact.
assess_result
Recorded tool call · completed