Research/Terra/ 222041
Task evidence / country-choropleth

How does electric consumption vary across Arctic nations?

PassComputational taskUnpublished draft
Download evidence JSON ↓

The question

222041
How does electric consumption vary across Arctic nations?
Exact submitted task and declared adaptations
How does electric consumption vary across Arctic nations?

Task conventions: Use the frozen country polygons and World Bank EG.USE.ELEC.KH.PC 2014 column, in kWh per capita. These are country-level indicators, not a subnational surface or a new regional aggregation. Join the supplied ISO_A3 to Country Code exactly. Nonmatching identifiers and missing measurements remain unknown; do not guess them or substitute another year. Retain every original country feature in the declared geography and its benchmark_row_id, including unknowns. No data must have a distinct map category, not zero. Create a quantitative choropleth with five quantile classes (fewer only if tied values collapse breaks), a visible legend with numeric bounds and units, and a neutral No data category. Values equal to a class break enter the upper class. Preserve negative and genuine zero values. This fixed classification and year are disclosed evaluation conventions; do not retrieve live replacements. Count original boundary features, not deduplicated sovereign states; preserve all source rows that meet the declared geography. Country-code sentinels such as -99 remain unmatched. Geography is fixed to original country features with NAME_EN in ["Canada", "Denmark", "Finland", "Iceland", "Norway", "Russian Federation", "Sweden", "United States"]; retain all matching source geometries, and no others. Classification is calculated only over this geography. Membership reflects this disclosed benchmark edition, not current organization membership.



Add the resulting quantitative country layer to the map and retain an inspectable data artifact containing the original country geometry, benchmark_row_id, numeric value and class. End with one fenced JSON object: {count: countries with a known numeric value, unknown_count: countries without one, coverage_note: string, selection: {collectionId, itemId, assetKey}, value_field: numeric_column_name, class_field: classification_column_name, map_layer_id: delivered_layer_id}. The artifact must include known AND unknown countries, not only the known subset. Explain the year, units, key limitations and legend in the final response.

Delivery format: provide the answer object with all fields specified above as final_response on assess_result, alongside the inspected final artifact_refs. This replaces the JSON-code-block formatting requirement above. Blue attaches your explicit selection to the accepted final answer. Finish with a concise ordinary-language answer agreeing with that selected result; do not duplicate the JSON in chat.

Supplied immutable inputs:
[
  {
    "name": "World Bank country boundaries",
    "edition": "GeoBenchX harmonized names",
    "units": {},
    "collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
    "itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
    "assetKey": "data"
  },
  {
    "name": "Electric power consumption per capita",
    "edition": "Frozen WDI; use 2014",
    "units": {
      "2014": "kWh per capita"
    },
    "collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
    "itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
    "assetKey": "data"
  }
]

Outcome & verification

Independent artifact and delivery checks passed.

Duration
21m 5s
Recorded Blue tool calls
42
Total tokens
2,207,711
Model cost
Not recorded
Application revision
d50497ea9084f29c91b05406688f87035df98d8a
Release
terra-geobenchx-v1

Recorded final answer

I added the 2014 Arctic-country electricity-use layer to the map. Among known rows, Iceland is highest at 53,832.5 kWh per capita. Canada and Finland are also high, while Denmark and Russia are lowest among the known values. The legend uses five quantile classes with breaks at 7,865.6, 13,188.4, 14,542.1, and 15,522.0 kWh per capita, plus a neutral No data category. There are 7 known country features and 1 No data feature. The retained Norway benchmark row stayed No data because its supplied ISO_A3 value is `-99`, so it could not exactly match the frozen World Bank `Country Code` field. This is a fixed 2014 country-level benchmark, not current consumption and not a subnational map. Sources: World Bank country boundaries benchmark fixture and frozen World Bank WDI EG.USE.ELEC.KH.PC 2014, Blue-hosted supplied inputs, retrieved 2026-10-07. ### Limitations - This is a country-level 2014 indicator on frozen benchmark country rows; it does not show subnational variation or current conditions. - Exact join matches are limited to supplied ISO_A3 and Country Code values; one retained benchmark row remains unknown and is shown as No data. - This is a country-level 2014 indicator on frozen benchmark country rows; it does not show current conditions or within-country variation. - One retained benchmark row remains No data because ISO_A3 = -99 did not exactly match any Country Code in the supplied frozen indicator table. - The geography follows the supplied benchmark edition only, not current Arctic membership definitions. - The retained geography follows the supplied benchmark edition only, not current Arctic membership definitions. - Exact matches are limited to supplied ISO_A3 and Country Code values; the retained -99 code row remains unknown. - The classes summarize 2014 country averages only and do not show within-country variation.

Independent checks

These checks are separate from the agent's own assessment. A successful job or an assertion of success is not enough to pass.

Expected count
7
Reported count
7
Computation verified
Yes
Answer fulfilled
Yes
Full grading and rubric record
{
  "expectedCount": 7,
  "actualCount": 7,
  "expectedMetrics": null,
  "actualMetrics": null,
  "computationCorrect": true,
  "answerFulfilled": true,
  "adjudication": null,
  "qualification": null,
  "reasons": []
}

Recorded investigation findings

The agent's reported hypotheses and assessments, retained as evidence of its process—not independent proof that the answer is correct. Failed calls retain their requested verdict, not an accepted assessment.

run_trial · completed

Does the exact fixed-geography workflow retain every supplied Arctic-country boundary row, join only the frozen 2014 World Bank electricity value by ISO_A3 = Country Code, and produce the required quantile choropleth with a distinct No data class?

assess_trial · completed · assessment: insufficient

The tested method retained 8 original boundary rows for the fixed geography, preserved benchmark_row_id, and the exact left join on ISO_A3 = Country Code matched 7 rows while keeping one -99 code row unknown. The quantile classifier produced 5 classes plus class 0 for missing data, but its summary reported a break-boundary convention that conflicts with the benchmark requirement, so the delivery method is not yet fully confirmed.

run_trial · completed

When vector-classify uses explicit breaks, do values exactly equal to a break enter the upper class as required by the benchmark convention?

run_trial · completed

When vector-classify uses explicit breaks, do values exactly equal to a break enter the upper class as required by the benchmark convention?

assess_trial · completed · assessment: inconclusive

This toy classifier test did not answer the question because the import step failed before classification. The failure was an argument mistake: vector-import rejected a properties field named feature_id because that name conflicts with imported GeoJSON feature IDs.

assess_trial · completed · assessment: sufficient

The corrected synthetic test showed the actual classifier behavior matches the benchmark requirement: value 10 with breaks [10,20] was assigned to class 2, value 20 was assigned to class 3, and the null value was assigned to class 0 as No data. This confirms that vector-classify places break-equal values in the upper class even though the summary text reported a conflicting boundary description.

assess_result · completed · assessment: sufficient

The delivered artifact retains the fixed 8-country benchmark geography, preserves benchmark_row_id and original geometry, joins the frozen 2014 electricity-consumption field by exact ISO_A3 = Country Code, and keeps the unmatched -99 row as No data. The final map layer is added to the map and the classifier summary shows five quantile classes in kWh per capita plus one neutral No data class.

Recorded workflow

  1. 01

    Quantile choropleth

    Recorded vector-classify · succeeded

  2. 02

    Fixed Arctic benchmark geography

    Recorded vector-filter · succeeded

  3. 03

    Supplied country boundaries

    Recorded source · succeeded

  4. 04

    Arctic electricity use in 2014

    Recorded output · succeeded

  5. 05

    Supplied electric consumption table

    Recorded source · succeeded

  6. 06

    Join frozen 2014 electric consumption

    Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded

  7. 07

    Manual break classifier test

    Recorded vector-classify · succeeded

  8. 08

    Synthetic break-boundary test features

    Recorded vector-import · succeeded

  9. 09

    Manual break classifier test

    Recorded output · succeeded

  10. 10

    Manual break classifier test

    Recorded output · succeeded

  11. 11

    Manual break classifier test

    Recorded vector-classify · skipped

  12. 12

    Synthetic break-boundary test features

    Recorded vector-import · failed

  13. 13

    Manual break classifier test

    Recorded output · skipped

  14. 14

    Manual break classifier test

    Recorded output · skipped

  15. 15

    Quantile choropleth

    Recorded vector-classify · succeeded

  16. 16

    Fixed Arctic benchmark geography

    Recorded vector-filter · succeeded

  17. 17

    Supplied country boundaries

    Recorded source · succeeded

  18. 18

    Supplied electric consumption table

    Recorded source · succeeded

  19. 19

    Join frozen 2014 electric consumption

    Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded

  20. 20

    Fixed Arctic benchmark geography

    Recorded output · succeeded

  21. 21

    Join frozen 2014 electric consumption

    Recorded output · succeeded

  22. 22

    Quantile choropleth

    Recorded output · succeeded

  23. 23

    Quantile choropleth

    Recorded output · succeeded

Activity

Recorded actions

Recorded observable actions only, not private reasoning. Raw payloads, geometry, private links and credentials are omitted; full evidence is retained privately. Activity/workflow lists bounded at 500 entries.

  1. Progress update

    I’m checking the supplied files first so I can keep the exact country rows, use the frozen 2014 field, and test the join before I build the final map layer.

  2. get_analysis

    Recorded tool call · completed

  3. get_collection

    Recorded tool call · completed

  4. get_collection

    Recorded tool call · completed

  5. Progress update

    I found the two supplied immutable inputs. Next I’m checking their declared fields so I can use the exact join keys, keep benchmark_row_id, and avoid silently switching year or geography.

  6. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · failed

  7. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · failed

  8. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  9. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  10. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  11. list_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  12. Progress update

    I’ve confirmed these are immutable benchmark inputs, but their field schema is not exposed in collection metadata. I’m now discovering the exact processors and running a small private trial to verify the join keys, the fixed 2014 column, and the required no-data handling before I save the final workflow.

  13. describe_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  14. describe_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  15. update_analysis_brief

    Recorded tool call · completed

  16. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  17. run_trial

    Recorded tool call · completed

  18. list_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  19. Progress update

    The test mostly worked: it kept 8 original country rows, joined 7 exact code matches, and left 1 unmatched row unknown. I found one important limitation before I save the final map: the classifier summary reports a different break-boundary rule than the benchmark convention, so I’m checking whether I need a small method change before delivery.

  20. Progress update

    I found a small way to settle the remaining question: I’m running a tiny synthetic classification check at exact break values. If the processor really places break-equal values in the upper class, I can reuse the tested method. If not, I’ll change the method before delivery.

  21. describe_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  22. get_trial_report

    Recorded tool call · completed

  23. assess_trial

    Recorded tool call · completed

  24. Progress update

    I’m testing the classifier directly on a six-point toy dataset with values 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and null against manual breaks at 10 and 20. I expect 10 to land in class 2 and 20 in class 3 if the processor really uses the required upper-class rule.

  25. run_trial

    Recorded tool call · completed

  26. Progress update

    The first toy test did not run because the import processor reserves `feature_id`. I’m correcting that input and rerunning the same tiny boundary check, not changing the main country analysis.

  27. run_trial

    Recorded tool call · completed

  28. Progress update

    The tiny boundary check failed for an input-name reason, not because the classifier itself failed. I’m recording that as an inconclusive test so I can rerun the corrected toy check cleanly.

  29. assess_trial

    Recorded tool call · completed

  30. Progress update

    The corrected toy check settled the last method question: values exactly on a break did go into the upper class, and null stayed in No data. I can now save the production workflow with the tested country join and choropleth method, then run and verify the final layer.

  31. assess_trial

    Recorded tool call · completed

  32. get_analysis

    Recorded tool call · completed

  33. get_analysis

    Recorded tool call · completed

  34. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  35. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  36. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  37. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  38. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  39. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  40. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  41. update_analysis_brief

    Recorded tool call · completed

  42. Progress update

    I’ve finished the method check. Now I’m saving the exact tested production workflow, with the fixed country filter, exact ISO code join, 2014 field, and five-quantile choropleth conventions locked in.

  43. propose_workflow

    Recorded tool call · completed

  44. Progress update

    The saved workflow is scientifically ready, but Blue wants one more bookkeeping step: I need to attach how the later toy test resolved the earlier boundary-rule concern and the failed first toy attempt. Then I can run the exact saved proposal.

  45. assess_plan

    Recorded tool call · completed

  46. execute_workflow

    Recorded tool call · completed

  47. Progress update

    The run appears to have finished successfully in the background. I’m inspecting the final workflow output now so I can verify the delivered rows, legend fields, and then bind the exact output to the map.

  48. inspect_workflow_results

    Recorded tool call · completed

  49. list_map_layers

    Recorded tool call · completed

  50. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  51. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  52. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  53. Progress update

    The final inspection job is ready. I’m reading the delivered rows now so I can lock the exact artifact, counts, and layer ID into the accepted result.

  54. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  55. Progress update

    I’ve verified the final artifact: 8 retained country features, 7 known 2014 values, 1 No data row, and the final layer is already on the map. I’m recording the accepted result now with the exact artifact and layer IDs.

  56. assess_result

    Recorded tool call · completed

|||

© 2026 Exia Labs, Inc.