Research/Terra/ 104119
Task evidence / country-change-selection

How many Latin American seaports are located in regions with high population growth

FailComputational taskUnpublished draft
Download evidence JSON ↓

The question

104119
How many Latin American seaports are located in regions with high population growth?
Exact submitted task and declared adaptations
How many Latin American seaports are located in regions with high population growth?

Task conventions: High growth means 2023 total population divided by 2013 total population strictly greater than 1.1, using WDI SP.POP.TOTL. This freezes the reference's ten-year comparison and 10% growth cutoff. Count records in the supplied USGS mineral-exporting-port inventory, not all modern commercial seaports. Use original country polygons with SUBREGION in ["Central America", "Caribbean", "South America"]. Use exact ISO_A3/Country Code matching. A point qualifies only when strictly within a qualifying original country polygon. Count original point records once, regardless of operational status. Missing observations, nonmatching country codes, nonpositive denominators and nonfinite derived values are unknown, never zero. Points in unknown-measurement countries and points without valid geometry are unknown. Valid points outside all selected geographical polygons do not qualify and are not counted as unknown. Do not infer locations from point country-name attributes or fetch live substitutes. Maps are optional.



Produce an inspectable selected-point artifact retaining original geometry and benchmark_row_id. End with one fenced JSON object: {count: selected original point records, unknown_count: points with unknown eligibility under the stated coverage rule, unlocated_count: original point records lacking valid geometry, coverage_note: string, selection: {collectionId, itemId, assetKey}}. Explain the fixed years, threshold and coverage in the final answer.

Delivery format: provide the answer object with all fields specified above as final_response on assess_result, alongside the inspected final artifact_refs. This replaces the JSON-code-block formatting requirement above. Blue attaches your explicit selection to the accepted final answer. Finish with a concise ordinary-language answer agreeing with that selected result; do not duplicate the JSON in chat.

Supplied immutable inputs:
[
  {
    "name": "Latin American mineral-exporting seaports",
    "edition": "USGS OFR 2017-1079 frozen benchmark compilation",
    "units": {},
    "collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
    "itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
    "assetKey": "data"
  },
  {
    "name": "World Bank country boundaries",
    "edition": "GeoBenchX harmonized names",
    "units": {},
    "collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
    "itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
    "assetKey": "data"
  },
  {
    "name": "World Bank SP.POP.TOTL",
    "edition": "Frozen GeoBenchX World Development Indicators; use 2023",
    "units": {
      "2023": "people"
    },
    "collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
    "itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
    "assetKey": "data"
  }
]

Outcome & verification

Approval policy: explicit reduced or unavailable work is not preauthorized.; No accepted final answer was published.

Duration
21m 19s
Recorded Blue tool calls
61
Total tokens
2,701,893
Model cost
Not recorded
Application revision
d50497ea9084f29c91b05406688f87035df98d8a
Release
terra-geobenchx-v1

Recorded final answer

No final answer was recorded within the evaluation window.

Independent checks

These checks are separate from the agent's own assessment. A successful job or an assertion of success is not enough to pass.

Expected count
91
Reported count
Not recorded
Computation verified
No
Answer fulfilled
No
Full grading and rubric record
{
  "expectedCount": 91,
  "actualCount": null,
  "expectedMetrics": null,
  "actualMetrics": null,
  "computationCorrect": false,
  "answerFulfilled": false,
  "adjudication": null,
  "qualification": null,
  "reasons": [
    "Approval policy: explicit reduced or unavailable work is not preauthorized.",
    "No accepted final answer was published."
  ]
}

Recorded investigation findings

The agent's reported hypotheses and assessments, retained as evidence of its process—not independent proof that the answer is correct. Failed calls retain their requested verdict, not an accepted assessment.

run_trial · completed

Does the full benchmark method correctly classify Latin American country polygons by the fixed 2023/2013 population ratio and then select qualifying and unknown original port points using strict within matching?

run_trial · completed

Can a focused correction preserve the original port geometry and benchmark_row_id field while reproducing the same qualifying, unknown, and unlocated counts under the fixed Latin America and population-growth rules?

assess_trial · completed · assessment: insufficient

The full-scope investigation established the analytical counts and coverage handling: 48 original Latin American country polygons were selected by SUBREGION, 42 matched WDI by exact ISO_A3/Country Code, and 6 remained unmatched and therefore unknown-country polygons. The fixed-population rule identified 19 qualifying country polygons with pop_ratio > 1.1. The strict within join selected 91 original port records in qualifying countries, and the unknown-country join selected 0 valid port records. The left join to all selected Latin country polygons reported inputTargetRecords 230, targetFeatures 230, targetRecordsOmittedBeforeJoin 0, matchedTargetFeatures 174, and unmatchedTargetFeatures 56, so no original records lacked usable geometry in this run and 56 valid points lay outside the selected Latin country polygons.

assess_trial · completed · assessment: sufficient

The focused correction preserved the original port schema while reproducing the established counts. The corrected qualifying-point artifact contains 91 original port records, keeps the original benchmark_row_id field, preserves point geometry, and reports country_match_count = 1 for every selected row. The corrected unknown-country point count is 0. The left aggregate join to all selected Latin country polygons reported inputTargetRecords 230, targetFeatures 230, targetRecordsOmittedBeforeJoin 0, matchedTargetFeatures 174, and unmatchedTargetFeatures 56, confirming unlocated_count 0 and showing that valid unmatched points are outside the selected Latin country polygons rather than unknown.

assess_result · failed · requested assessment: sufficient

Using the supplied immutable benchmark fixtures, I filtered original World Bank country polygons to SUBREGION Central America, Caribbean, and South America, joined frozen WDI SP.POP.TOTL by exact ISO_A3/Country Code, and classified high-growth countries where 2023 population divided by 2013 population is strictly greater than 1.1. The join matched 42 selected polygons and left 6 polygons as unknown-growth. The high-growth set contains 19 polygons. The corrected selected-point artifact preserves original point geometry and the original benchmark_row_id field and contains 91 qualifying original port records. Supporting count outputs show 230 original benchmark port records total, 91 qualifying records, 0 unknown-eligibility records, and the all-port left join kept all 230 source records with targetRecordsOmittedBeforeJoin 0, so unlocated_count is 0.

Output previews

Actual executed workflow and step outcomes
Diagram generated from the saved workflow. This is not a map or proof of correctness; see independent checks.Exia Labs, generated from benchmark execution metadata. · Exia Labs study illustration; publication pending owner review.

Recorded workflow

  1. 01

    count qual ports fix

    Recorded table-group-statistics · skipped

  2. 02

    count total ports fix

    Recorded table-group-statistics · skipped

  3. 03

    count unknown ports fix

    Recorded table-group-statistics · skipped

  4. 04

    Ports in high-growth Latin American countries

    Recorded output · skipped

  5. 05

    Qualifying port count

    Recorded output · skipped

  6. 06

    Unknown eligibility count

    Recorded output · skipped

  7. 07

    Benchmark port total

    Recorded output · skipped

  8. 08

    All benchmark ports matched to selected Latin country polygons

    Recorded output · skipped

  9. 09

    latin match all fix

    Recorded vector-spatial-join · skipped

  10. 10

    qual countries fix

    Recorded vector-filter · skipped

  11. 11

    qualifying ports fix

    Recorded vector-spatial-join · skipped

  12. 12

    blue-generated--[resource id withheld]

    Recorded source · skipped

  13. 13

    blue-generated--[resource id withheld]

    Recorded source · skipped

  14. 14

    blue-generated--[resource id withheld]

    Recorded source · skipped

  15. 15

    unknown countries fix

    Recorded vector-filter · skipped

  16. 16

    unknown ports fix

    Recorded vector-spatial-join · skipped

  17. 17

    count qual ports fix

    Recorded table-group-statistics · succeeded

  18. 18

    count total ports fix

    Recorded table-group-statistics · succeeded

  19. 19

    count unknown ports fix

    Recorded table-group-statistics · succeeded

  20. 20

    latin match all fix

    Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded

  21. 21

    qual countries fix

    Recorded vector-filter · succeeded

  22. 22

    qualifying ports fix

    Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded

  23. 23

    blue-generated--[resource id withheld]

    Recorded source · succeeded

  24. 24

    blue-generated--[resource id withheld]

    Recorded source · succeeded

  25. 25

    blue-generated--[resource id withheld]

    Recorded source · succeeded

  26. 26

    latin match all fix

    Recorded output · succeeded

  27. 27

    count total ports fix

    Recorded output · succeeded

  28. 28

    count qual ports fix

    Recorded output · succeeded

  29. 29

    count unknown ports fix

    Recorded output · succeeded

  30. 30

    unknown countries fix

    Recorded vector-filter · succeeded

  31. 31

    unknown ports fix

    Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded

  32. 32

    count qual ports

    Recorded table-group-statistics · succeeded

  33. 33

    countries wdi

    Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded

  34. 34

    count total ports

    Recorded table-group-statistics · succeeded

  35. 35

    count unknown valid ports

    Recorded table-group-statistics · succeeded

  36. 36

    count valid ports all

    Recorded table-group-statistics · succeeded

  37. 37

    growth countries

    Recorded vector-field-calculate · succeeded

  38. 38

    latin countries

    Recorded vector-filter · succeeded

  39. 39

    qual countries

    Recorded vector-filter · succeeded

  40. 40

    qualifying ports

    Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded

  41. 41

    blue-generated--[resource id withheld]

    Recorded source · succeeded

  42. 42

    blue-generated--[resource id withheld]

    Recorded source · succeeded

  43. 43

    blue-generated--[resource id withheld]

    Recorded source · succeeded

  44. 44

    count total ports

    Recorded output · succeeded

  45. 45

    count qual ports

    Recorded output · succeeded

  46. 46

    count unknown valid ports

    Recorded output · succeeded

  47. 47

    count valid ports all

    Recorded output · succeeded

  48. 48

    unknown countries

    Recorded vector-filter · succeeded

  49. 49

    unknown valid ports

    Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded

  50. 50

    valid ports all

    Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded

Activity

Recorded actions

Recorded observable actions only, not private reasoning. Raw payloads, geometry, private links and credentials are omitted; full evidence is retained privately. Activity/workflow lists bounded at 500 entries.

  1. Progress update

    I’ll check the retained analysis context and inspect the three supplied datasets so I can build a small tested method before I count the qualifying ports.

  2. get_analysis

    Recorded tool call · completed

  3. get_collection

    Recorded tool call · completed

  4. get_collection

    Recorded tool call · completed

  5. get_collection

    Recorded tool call · completed

  6. Progress update

    I found the three supplied inputs and their exact item IDs. Next I’m checking their field structure and sample values so I can use the fixed ISO and year rules exactly as you requested.

  7. get_item

    Recorded tool call · completed

  8. get_item

    Recorded tool call · completed

  9. get_item

    Recorded tool call · completed

  10. list_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  11. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  12. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  13. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  14. describe_processors

    Recorded tool call · failed

  15. describe_processors

    Recorded tool call · failed

  16. Progress update

    I’ve identified the likely processors. I need their exact schemas next so I can avoid guessing predicates or join settings.

  17. describe_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  18. describe_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  19. describe_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  20. describe_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  21. Progress update

    I have the filter, join, and calculation processors. One spatial-join schema was deferred, so I’m pulling that exact section before I build the test workflow.

  22. describe_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  23. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  24. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  25. Progress update

    Before the first trial, I’m sampling a few rows from each supplied file. That will confirm the exact code fields and show whether the benchmark already carries any null geometry or blank codes.

  26. get_collection

    Recorded tool call · completed

  27. get_collection

    Recorded tool call · completed

  28. get_collection

    Recorded tool call · completed

  29. update_analysis_brief

    Recorded tool call · completed

  30. Progress update

    I’ve built the first full-scope test. It uses only the supplied fixtures, joins WDI to country polygons by exact ISO code, applies the fixed 2013→2023 ratio rule, and then does strict point-within-country selection on the original ports.

  31. run_trial

    Recorded tool call · completed

  32. Progress update

    The test finished. I have a preliminary count, but I still need to verify two practical points before I call it final: whether any port records lacked valid geometry, and whether any country join cases stayed unknown.

  33. inspect_workflow_results

    Recorded tool call · completed

  34. inspect_workflow_results

    Recorded tool call · completed

  35. get_trial_report

    Recorded tool call · completed

  36. Progress update

    I have enough to see that the first method is close, but not enough yet to mark it final. I’m now inspecting the country-join output and the selected-point output directly so I can confirm unmatched ISO cases and preserve the exact qualifying point artifact.

  37. Progress update

    I’ve confirmed the join produced 48 Latin American country polygons, with 42 exact ISO code matches and 6 unmatched ISO cases. Next I’m checking the matched country rows and the selected point rows themselves so I can verify unknown handling and the final benchmark_row_id selection.

  38. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  39. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  40. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  41. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  42. Progress update

    I’m reusing the finished inspection jobs now. This will tell me whether any ports fell in unmatched-code countries, whether any points were outside the Latin country polygons, and whether the selected rows keep the original benchmark IDs.

  43. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  44. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  45. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  46. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  47. Progress update

    I found one real defect: the first selected-point output renamed `benchmark_row_id` because the country layer carried the same field name. I’m correcting that now with an aggregate spatial join so the final selected artifact keeps the original port geometry and original benchmark ID field.

  48. run_trial

    Recorded tool call · completed

  49. assess_trial

    Recorded tool call · completed

  50. Progress update

    The correction finished successfully. I now have a qualifying-point artifact that keeps the original port benchmark_row_id field, plus verified count outputs for qualifying ports, unknown ports, and all original ports.

  51. Progress update

    I’m doing one last check on the corrected selected-point artifact itself. This is just to confirm the original `benchmark_row_id` field is present on the final qualifying port rows before I record the answer.

  52. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  53. inspect_workflow_results

    Recorded tool call · completed

  54. Progress update

    I’m reusing the completed preview now. After that I can record the final result with the corrected selected-port artifact and the verified counts.

  55. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  56. inspect_workflow_results

    Recorded tool call · completed

  57. assess_trial

    Recorded tool call · completed

  58. Progress update

    I’ve finished the checks. The corrected result keeps the original port benchmark IDs, the fixed 2023 versus 2013 rule is applied, and the unknown and unlocated counts are both zero in this benchmark.

  59. update_analysis_brief

    Recorded tool call · completed

  60. assess_result

    Recorded tool call · failed

  61. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  62. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  63. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  64. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  65. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  66. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  67. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  68. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  69. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  70. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  71. Progress update

    The counts are verified, but Blue won’t accept a private trial artifact as the final selected output. I’m promoting the tested computation into a proper final workflow now so the selected point artifact can be attached to the answer.

  72. propose_workflow

    Recorded tool call · failed

  73. Progress update

    The proposal schema check found one binding issue, not a data problem. I’m correcting the two ambiguous requirement bindings to the qualifying-country join and resubmitting the same tested method.

  74. propose_workflow

    Recorded tool call · failed

  75. Progress update

    I’m keeping the final artifact and support tables, but narrowing the two country-growth requirement references to the actual qualifying branch that feeds the selected ports.

  76. propose_workflow

    Recorded tool call · completed

  77. get_analysis

    Recorded tool call · completed

  78. assess_plan

    Recorded tool call · completed

  79. Progress update

    The workflow itself is runnable, but Blue wants the earlier adverse finding formally resolved against this saved proposal before execution. I’m recording that the corrected proposal fixes the renamed benchmark field issue.

  80. Progress update

    The proposal is now supported. I’m running that exact saved workflow so the final selected-point artifact is no longer just a private trial output.

  81. execute_workflow

    Recorded tool call · completed

|||

© 2026 Exia Labs, Inc.