{ "releaseId": "terra-geobenchx-v1", "taskId": "253892", "question": "Create a heatmap of seaport density in regions with high GDP growth in Latin America.", "submittedPrompt": "Create a heatmap of seaport density in regions with high GDP growth in Latin America.\n\nTask conventions: Use supplied countries with SUBREGION in [\"South America\", \"Caribbean\", \"Central America\"]. High growth follows the released reference: 2023 current-USD GDP per capita divided by 2018 GDP per capita at least 1.34. It is nominal GDP-per-capita growth, not inflation-adjusted total GDP growth. Use unit port count weights, not the FACID_NUM identifier. Use original point records strictly within the original selected country polygons; no clipped polygons, location guesses or current data. Join country ISO_A3 to the supplied indicator table's Country Code exactly. Unknown country indicators, nonpositive ratio denominators, missing geometry and missing/nonfinite weights are unknown, not zero. Known zero weights remain valid. Exclude valid points outside the specified geography. Include only eligible points with a finite nonnegative weight in the contributing artifact; report other potentially eligible points as unknown. Use this explicit geographic heatmap convention: grid={\"bounds\": [-18000000, -7325000, 18000000, 7325000], \"crs\": \"EPSG:6933\", \"resolutionX\": 25000, \"resolutionY\": 25000}, radius 150000 metres = three Gaussian standard deviations. First bin each point into its containing grid cell and sum its weight. Smooth using a normalized separable Gaussian, numerical support four standard deviations, constant-zero exterior; do not renormalize edges. Use both grid resolutions for the two axes; keep original grid alignment. This is a declared metric raster adaptation to the original interactive screen-pixel heatmap, not an equivalent zoom-dependent rendering. Output unit: events per grid cell. Zero cells are valid; this is not density per square kilometre. Do not rescale the values for presentation.\n\n\n\nAdd the heatmap raster to the map and retain an inspectable selected-point artifact with original geometry and benchmark_row_id. End with one fenced JSON object: {count: contributing point records, unknown_count: records with unknown eligibility or weight, unlocated_count: original points lacking valid geometry, coverage_note: string, selection: {collectionId,itemId,assetKey}, density: {collectionId,itemId,assetKey}, map_layer_id: heatmap_layer_id}. Explain the data edition, numerical weights, grid, smoothing and coverage limitations. The source-point artifact is not itself the requested heatmap.\n\nDelivery format: provide the answer object with all fields specified above as final_response on assess_result, alongside the inspected final artifact_refs. This replaces the JSON-code-block formatting requirement above. Blue attaches your explicit selection to the accepted final answer. Finish with a concise ordinary-language answer agreeing with that selected result; do not duplicate the JSON in chat.\n\nSupplied immutable inputs:\n[\n {\n \"name\": \"Latin American mineral-exporting seaports\",\n \"edition\": \"USGS OFR 2017-1079 frozen benchmark compilation\",\n \"units\": {},\n \"collectionId\": \"blue-generated--[resource id withheld]\",\n \"itemId\": \"[resource id withheld]\",\n \"assetKey\": \"data\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"World Bank country boundaries\",\n \"edition\": \"GeoBenchX harmonized names\",\n \"units\": {},\n \"collectionId\": \"blue-generated--[resource id withheld]\",\n \"itemId\": \"[resource id withheld]\",\n \"assetKey\": \"data\"\n },\n {\n \"name\": \"GDP per capita\",\n \"edition\": \"Frozen WDI; current US dollars by year\",\n \"units\": {\n \"2023\": \"current USD per capita\",\n \"2020\": \"current USD per capita\",\n \"2022\": \"current USD per capita\"\n },\n \"collectionId\": \"blue-generated--[resource id withheld]\",\n \"itemId\": \"[resource id withheld]\",\n \"assetKey\": \"data\"\n }\n]", "finalAnswer": "Done — the heatmap is on your map, and the matching 56 contributing seaport records were published for inspection.\n\nIt uses unit port counts on the declared 25 km EPSG:6933 grid, smoothed with the declared 150 km Gaussian radius. Sources: USGS OFR 2017-1079 frozen benchmark seaports; World Bank country boundaries, GeoBenchX harmonized edition; frozen World Bank WDI GDP per capita.\n\nMain limitation: 7 ports in Cuba and Venezuela remain unknown because the supplied GDP table does not confirm their 2023 country values for the exact join rule. Also, “high growth” here is nominal 2023/2018 GDP per capita, not inflation-adjusted or total GDP growth.\n\nNext: click the heatmap layer or inspect the contributing-point artifact to review the exact source records behind it.\n\n### Limitations\n\n- The result reflects the supplied frozen benchmark seaport compilation and does not represent current port activity or current infrastructure.\n- High growth here means nominal 2023 current-USD GDP per capita divided by 2018 GDP per capita; it is not inflation-adjusted growth and not total GDP growth.\n- Seven potentially eligible seaport records in Cuba and Venezuela remain unknown because the supplied GDP table does not provide confirmed 2023 values for those country joins.\n- The heatmap uses constant-zero exterior smoothing, so edge cells are not renormalized.\n- High growth is nominal current-USD GDP per capita ratio only.\n- Countries with missing 2023 GDP or nonpositive 2018 GDP remain unknown.\n- The final contributing artifact includes only known-eligible points with finite nonnegative unit weights.\n- Unknown-eligibility ports are counted separately and do not contribute to the heatmap.\n- The heatmap reflects only the supplied benchmark ports that pass the eligibility filter.\n- Zero cells are valid and values are not rescaled for presentation.", "checks": { "expectedCount": 56, "actualCount": 56, "expectedMetrics": null, "actualMetrics": null, "computationCorrect": true, "answerFulfilled": true, "adjudication": null, "qualification": null, "reasons": [] }, "activity": [ { "at": "2026-10-07T06:23:07.967678Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I’ll inspect the supplied sources and set up a small analysis brief first, then I’ll test the selection and heatmap method before proposing the full run." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:23:16.867269Z", "title": "get_analysis", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:23:29.296583Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I found no saved brief yet. Next I’m checking the three supplied snapshots for exact fields, item bindings, and whether the country table can support the required ISO join and years." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:23:29.715532Z", "title": "get_collection", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:23:29.743025Z", "title": "get_collection", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:23:31.940272Z", "title": "get_collection", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:23:46.458093Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · failed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:23:46.624018Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · failed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:23:46.992793Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · failed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:24:05.798725Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I have the snapshot metadata, but not the row fields yet. I’m saving a brief now so I can run private source-inspection trials and confirm the exact join keys, year columns, and point attributes before building the full method." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:24:18.636502Z", "title": "update_analysis_brief", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:24:29.022103Z", "title": "get_tool_help", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:24:29.259461Z", "title": "get_tool_help", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:24:29.385215Z", "title": "get_tool_help", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:24:38.668366Z", "title": "list_processors", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:24:45.545392Z", "title": "describe_processors", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:24:52.651666Z", "title": "describe_processors", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:24:53.139316Z", "title": "describe_processors", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:24:53.250395Z", "title": "describe_processors", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:25:02.497414Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I found a processor that already matches the declared heatmap behavior: `point-density`. Before I use it, I’m running a tiny private source trial to confirm the exact fields for SUBREGION, ISO code, GDP years, geometry, and benchmark_row_id." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:25:05.407980Z", "title": "run_trial", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:25:09.581645Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "The trial was rejected because the saved brief scope used string coordinates. I’m correcting that argument now, then I’ll rerun the source inspection." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:25:17.948685Z", "title": "update_analysis_brief", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:27:13.392167Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "The source trial finished. I confirmed the seaport points, country polygons, and the key boundary and GDP fields are present. I’m inspecting a few rows now to verify the exact year and code columns, then I’ll run one combined trial that reaches the actual selected points and heatmap output." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:27:19.582832Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:27:20.087044Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:27:21.287573Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:27:21.331380Z", "title": "get_trial_report", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:29:03.543742Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I’ve confirmed the needed source fields exist. Next I’m checking exact sample rows so I can wire the join and country filter correctly, then I’ll test the full selection-plus-heatmap method in one private run." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:29:03.574879Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:29:03.583623Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:29:04.608719Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:29:05.269996Z", "title": "get_trial_report", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:29:14.561153Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "The source check is sufficient: the required fields are there. One practical caution remains: the GDP table includes aggregate non-country rows, so the exact ISO_A3 = Country Code join and the subregion filter are both important. I’m moving to a combined trial that should produce the actual eligible points and the heatmap behavior, not just another setup check." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:29:16.791306Z", "title": "assess_trial", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:30:14.146112Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "Expectation: this full-method trial should give a smaller contributing-port set than the 230 original ports, because the geography excludes Mexico and only some selected countries should meet the 2023/2018 GDP-per-capita threshold. I also expect the selected points to keep unique `benchmark_row_id` values and the raster to land exactly on the declared 25 km EPSG:6933 grid." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:30:21.001295Z", "title": "run_trial", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:33:28.521905Z", "title": "get_tool_help", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:33:28.556533Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:33:32.708906Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:33:34.004812Z", "title": "get_trial_report", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:34:12.540976Z", "title": "list_processors", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:34:13.359249Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I found one likely delivery issue in the trial: the spatial join appears to rename the port and country row IDs to avoid a collision. I’m checking whether the original port ID is still present under a target-suffixed field; if so, I can save a production workflow that makes the selected points inspectable and keeps the heatmap unchanged." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:34:59.844824Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I confirmed the issue: the trial output keeps the original port ID as `benchmark_row_id_target`, not plain `benchmark_row_id`. That is a delivery defect, not a data gap. I’m running one focused correction trial now to keep the same 56 points and heatmap while preserving the original port ID field name in the selected-point artifact." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:35:01.579700Z", "title": "run_trial", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:37:33.121056Z", "title": "get_tool_help", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:37:33.303999Z", "title": "get_trial_report", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:37:35.053528Z", "title": "get_tool_help", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:37:35.360121Z", "title": "get_tool_help", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:37:43.340470Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I’ve got the correction result too: it preserves plain `benchmark_row_id` on the 56 contributing ports and keeps the heatmap identical. I’m reading the workflow schema now so I can save one clean production run with the final point artifact, heatmap, and supporting unknown-point count." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:37:47.046157Z", "title": "assess_trial", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:37:49.657960Z", "title": "get_tool_help", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:37:49.697556Z", "title": "get_tool_help", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:37:49.715672Z", "title": "get_tool_help", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:38:01.072636Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "The correction trial succeeded: same 56 contributing ports, plain `benchmark_row_id`, and the same heatmap values. I’m recording that, then I’ll save the production workflow with the supporting unknown-port branch so the final counts are all inspectable." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:38:06.800834Z", "title": "get_analysis", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:38:06.950208Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:38:35.507859Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I’ve tested the method end to end and fixed the point-ID field. I’m grabbing the exact eligible-country names now, then I’ll save and run the final workflow and add the heatmap layer." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:38:56.132014Z", "title": "update_analysis_brief", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:39:00.742240Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I’ve retired the stale setup notes in the brief. The remaining limits are now the real ones: frozen benchmark ports, nominal GDP-per-capita growth only, and 7 ports with unknown eligibility from missing country indicators. Then I’ll save the final workflow." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:39:32.655860Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "The first full-method trial proved the country filter, counts, and raster, but not the final selected-point field name. I’m marking that as insufficient and pointing to the correction, so the saved workflow uses the actually supported method." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:39:34.443860Z", "title": "assess_trial", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:39:55.104589Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I’m saving the full production workflow now. It uses the tested exact country filter, the corrected point-selection method, a separate unknown-port branch for the reported count, and the declared heatmap grid and smoothing." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:40:23.717024Z", "title": "propose_workflow", "detail": "Recorded tool call · failed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:40:33.575497Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "The only issue was bookkeeping: Blue treats a null parameter expectation as missing. I’m removing that one and resaving the same workflow." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:40:58.873900Z", "title": "propose_workflow", "detail": "Recorded tool call · failed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:41:23.137994Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "Blue wanted clearer requirement bindings. I’m tightening the contract so the eligible-country rule binds to the contributing-port join, and the unknown-country rule binds separately to the unknown-port support branch. The computation itself is unchanged." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:41:46.052975Z", "title": "propose_workflow", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:41:58.067878Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "The workflow is valid, but Blue wants the corrected trial formally tied back to the earlier failed point-ID attempt. I’m resolving that now so the saved workflow can run without rebuilding anything." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:41:58.117087Z", "title": "get_analysis", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:41:58.141943Z", "title": "get_analysis", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:42:10.876334Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I’ve got the exact finding reference. I’m resolving it with the correction trial evidence so Blue can treat the saved workflow as supported, not just syntactically valid." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:42:15.814536Z", "title": "assess_plan", "detail": "Recorded tool call · failed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:42:37.632415Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "Blue wants the correction evidence attached to the heatmap result itself. I’m doing a tiny retained-artifact trial now, using the already-corrected point and raster outputs, so the saved workflow can be approved without changing the computation again." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:42:42.338522Z", "title": "run_trial", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:43:51.088757Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I now have the exact retained-artifact confirmation Blue asked for: the corrected selected-point artifact still has 56 rows with plain `benchmark_row_id`, and the corrected heatmap stays on the same declared grid with the same values. I’m attaching that to the saved workflow so it can run." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:43:53.388332Z", "title": "assess_trial", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:43:58.817574Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I’ve now got the required sufficient correction evidence attached to the heatmap result itself. I’m clearing the saved workflow’s review hold, then I’ll execute it and inspect the final outputs." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:44:05.128733Z", "title": "assess_plan", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:44:31.162342Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "The method is now fully supported. I’m starting the saved final workflow. Once it finishes, I’ll inspect the published outputs and bind the heatmap layer to the map." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:44:31.646417Z", "title": "execute_workflow", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:56:14.055485Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "The final workflow finished in the background. I’m inspecting the published outputs now so I can verify the final artifact IDs, counts, and layer binding before I return the result." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:56:21.060499Z", "title": "inspect_workflow_results", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:56:40.641857Z", "title": "inspect_workflow_results", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:56:45.766798Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "The production run completed. I’m reading its exact output receipts now so I can verify the final artifact IDs and add the heatmap layer to the map." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:57:08.152263Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I’ve got the final artifact IDs and the map layer receipt. I’m doing one last bounded inspection of the final point and raster artifacts so the final answer is tied to the published outputs, not just the workflow summary." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:57:08.175269Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:57:08.183391Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:57:08.189036Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:57:09.092955Z", "title": "list_map_layers", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:57:43.298751Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I already have the final IDs and layer binding. I’m just fetching the final bounded previews now to verify the published point fields and raster statistics before I record the result." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:57:43.346134Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:57:43.375486Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:57:43.405095Z", "title": "inspect_artifact", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:57:52.436939Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I have the final counts, final artifact identities, and the live heatmap layer. I’m checking the exact `assess_result` input shape once, then I’ll record the final result object and finish." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:57:52.732894Z", "title": "get_tool_help", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:59:34.601712Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I’ve verified the final point and unknown-point artifacts. I’m recording the point-result decision first, then I’ll record the heatmap result with the answer object attached." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:59:41.788574Z", "title": "assess_result", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:59:51.832092Z", "title": "Progress update", "detail": "I’ve recorded the point result. Now I’m recording the heatmap result and the requested answer object, using the published raster, the selected-point artifact, and the supporting unknown-point artifact." }, { "at": "2026-10-07T07:00:13.625594Z", "title": "assess_result", "detail": "Recorded tool call · failed" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T07:01:35.006991Z", "title": "assess_result", "detail": "Recorded tool call · completed" } ], "workflow": [ { "title": "countries src", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "Unknown-eligibility seaports", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "Contributing seaports", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "Seaport density heatmap", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "eligible countries", "description": "Recorded vector-filter · succeeded" }, { "title": "gdp src", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "heatmap", "description": "Recorded point-density · succeeded" }, { "title": "latam countries", "description": "Recorded vector-filter · succeeded" }, { "title": "latam countries gdp", "description": "Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded" }, { "title": "latam countries ratio", "description": "Recorded vector-field-calculate · succeeded" }, { "title": "ports src", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "selected ports", "description": "Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded" }, { "title": "unknown countries", "description": "Recorded vector-filter · succeeded" }, { "title": "unknown ports", "description": "Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded" }, { "title": "heatmap corrected", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "selected ports corrected", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "selected ports corrected", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "heatmap corrected", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "eligible countries src", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "heatmap fixed", "description": "Recorded point-density · succeeded" }, { "title": "ports src", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "selected ports fixed", "description": "Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded" }, { "title": "selected ports fixed", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "heatmap fixed", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "countries src", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "eligible countries", "description": "Recorded vector-filter · succeeded" }, { "title": "gdp src", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "heatmap", "description": "Recorded point-density · succeeded" }, { "title": "latam countries", "description": "Recorded vector-filter · succeeded" }, { "title": "latam countries gdp", "description": "Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded" }, { "title": "latam countries ratio", "description": "Recorded vector-field-calculate · succeeded" }, { "title": "ports src", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "selected ports", "description": "Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded" }, { "title": "eligible countries", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "selected ports", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "unknown ports", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "heatmap", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "unknown countries", "description": "Recorded vector-filter · succeeded" }, { "title": "unknown ports", "description": "Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded" }, { "title": "countries src", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "gdp src", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "ports src", "description": "Recorded source · succeeded" }, { "title": "ports src", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "countries src", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" }, { "title": "gdp src", "description": "Recorded output · succeeded" } ], "previews": [], "activityDisclosure": "Recorded observable actions only, not private reasoning. Raw payloads, geometry, private links and credentials are omitted; full evidence is retained privately. Activity/workflow lists bounded at 500 entries.", "artifacts": [ { "sha256": "d2eba1307030ec9521b10481373aaf1bb69d0609d4d88acac074d634d97af9ad", "bytes": 8404920, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:25:49.759765+00:00" }, { "sha256": "18ce25b448f6b5a314e9d5dd91cefdbd54b1703becb9c687208c7c02acfa1d18", "bytes": 169677, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:25:49.759765+00:00" }, { "sha256": "fb0341457a978ceabd3d797fc40afb32b14a87e03b5419c361361f6812350d9e", "bytes": 38006, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:25:49.759765+00:00" }, { "sha256": "700cae0f0fd8a1d2e795770063192ee8389450a1e507fe6ef3e04fb990b11758", "bytes": 1172063, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:30:49.220183+00:00" }, { "sha256": "d5e9b3da87c11a0eccfa98cce738f07dfe9b4fcbbd5d14d2f2d8c1271d79dd2e", "bytes": 1175822, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:31:01.031422+00:00" }, { "sha256": "3caf5fc194f5161bf0228f6a1dc8c3364a752a4ec65e01dde1bf2df87d83cc73", "bytes": 1176736, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:31:22.469672+00:00" }, { "sha256": "820cd31d191714971aa5c4973e168d5a15f0a4230e932706c2c95ec87b330f14", "bytes": 186282, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:31:39.971802+00:00" }, { "sha256": "52fd3eb6662ec0de54bdea363ffce67c09b5d77390c96e54be1435cf869f688d", "bytes": 42560, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:31:55.393126+00:00" }, { "sha256": "2f718039e2acc1da8eb37dc6e99bd295b629657a83c4c86afb1a21b737921833", "bytes": 152290, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:31:55.393126+00:00" }, { "sha256": "279f86c5da99a22f285d392e4821657a42fb53d334eecd70a6ad521d451f6bbf", "bytes": 19118, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:32:31.886813+00:00" }, { "sha256": "9ead638d6440c0406a42e0bf6d7d0a497d58566a34eb937296c192ba2d3157a8", "bytes": 38529, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:32:31.886813+00:00" }, { "sha256": "28e1db4a1007b317463112a7538b1a8f07a483bedbc41b5cf78b3c13a1095938", "bytes": 25353, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:35:32.537728+00:00" }, { "sha256": "279f86c5da99a22f285d392e4821657a42fb53d334eecd70a6ad521d451f6bbf", "bytes": 19118, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:35:44.563666+00:00" }, { "sha256": "700cae0f0fd8a1d2e795770063192ee8389450a1e507fe6ef3e04fb990b11758", "bytes": 1172063, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:45:52.041509+00:00" }, { "sha256": "d5e9b3da87c11a0eccfa98cce738f07dfe9b4fcbbd5d14d2f2d8c1271d79dd2e", "bytes": 1175822, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:49:39.871640+00:00" }, { "sha256": "3caf5fc194f5161bf0228f6a1dc8c3364a752a4ec65e01dde1bf2df87d83cc73", "bytes": 1176736, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:51:17.527039+00:00" }, { "sha256": "820cd31d191714971aa5c4973e168d5a15f0a4230e932706c2c95ec87b330f14", "bytes": 186282, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:52:30.655924+00:00" }, { "sha256": "2f718039e2acc1da8eb37dc6e99bd295b629657a83c4c86afb1a21b737921833", "bytes": 152290, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:52:30.655924+00:00" }, { "sha256": "fae6d06fafee3b4b8a84dc1fae978a9531867fd58140f606c4bd311a8f56d245", "bytes": 21718, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:53:41.164520+00:00" }, { "sha256": "28e1db4a1007b317463112a7538b1a8f07a483bedbc41b5cf78b3c13a1095938", "bytes": 25353, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:53:41.164520+00:00" }, { "sha256": "279f86c5da99a22f285d392e4821657a42fb53d334eecd70a6ad521d451f6bbf", "bytes": 19118, "finishedAt": "2026-10-07T06:55:56.987069+00:00" } ], "snapshotSha256": "41029b419d5d1ab315305ba09fa726b5a40dbf087ef89162983d63ad122e16a9", "investigations": [ { "at": "2026-10-07T06:25:05.407980Z", "tool": "run_trial", "status": "completed", "verdict": null, "findings": null, "limitations": null, "next_action": null, "question": "Do the supplied snapshots expose the exact fields needed for country eligibility, strict point-in-polygon selection, and preserved benchmark_row_id delivery?" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:29:16.791306Z", "tool": "assess_trial", "status": "completed", "verdict": "sufficient", "findings": "The supplied boundary snapshot exposes SUBREGION and ISO_A3 fields on valid original country polygons. The supplied GDP table exposes Country Code plus numeric 2018 and 2023 GDP-per-capita columns. The supplied seaport snapshot contains valid Point geometries and benchmark_row_id for all 230 rows. These observations are sufficient to wire the exact country filter, ISO_A3-to-Country Code join, and preserved-point delivery.", "limitations": [ "The GDP table includes aggregate rows as well as countries, so exact ISO_A3 = Country Code joining and the country-polygon subregion filter remain necessary in the analytical computation." ], "next_action": "Run one full requested-method trial that selects eligible countries, selects strictly contained original seaport points, and builds the declared 25 km EPSG:6933 Gaussian heatmap.", "question": null }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:30:21.001295Z", "tool": "run_trial", "status": "completed", "verdict": null, "findings": null, "limitations": null, "next_action": null, "question": "Does the full requested computation produce unique contributing original point records and the declared heatmap raster for high-growth Latin American countries?" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:35:01.579700Z", "tool": "run_trial", "status": "completed", "verdict": null, "findings": null, "limitations": null, "next_action": null, "question": "Can I select the same contributing points with an aggregate spatial join so the output keeps the original port benchmark_row_id field name while leaving the heatmap unchanged?" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:37:47.046157Z", "tool": "assess_trial", "status": "completed", "verdict": "sufficient", "findings": "Using aggregate spatial join preserves the original port benchmark_row_id field name while keeping the same 56 strictly within-country contributing point records. The corrected selected-point output keeps valid original point geometry and benchmark_row_id from the port source, and the corrected heatmap remains identical on the declared EPSG:6933 25 km grid with 150000 m Gaussian smoothing and total input weight 56.", "limitations": [ "This correction trial reused the already-tested eligible-country artifact from the prior full-method trial; the production workflow should restore the same eligibility branch explicitly so the full deliverable remains self-contained." ], "next_action": "Save the production workflow with explicit country-eligibility, unknown-port, corrected selected-port, and heatmap branches, then execute and inspect the final outputs.", "question": null }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:39:34.443860Z", "tool": "assess_trial", "status": "completed", "verdict": "insufficient", "findings": "The trial correctly identified 4 eligible countries, 56 contributing ports, 7 unknown-eligibility ports, and a heatmap on the declared EPSG:6933 25 km grid with 150000 m Gaussian smoothing. However, the selected-port output did not preserve the original port benchmark_row_id field name directly because the spatial join renamed colliding ID fields.", "limitations": [ "The selected-point artifact from this trial is not the requested final deliverable because it exposes the original port ID as a suffixed field instead of plain benchmark_row_id." ], "next_action": "Use the tested aggregate spatial join correction from trial [resource id withheld] so the final selected-point artifact preserves plain benchmark_row_id while keeping the same 56 contributing ports and unchanged heatmap values.", "question": null }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:42:42.338522Z", "tool": "run_trial", "status": "completed", "verdict": null, "findings": null, "limitations": null, "next_action": null, "question": "Do the retained corrected selected-point and heatmap artifacts resolve the final delivery defect for the seaport-density result?" }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:43:53.388332Z", "tool": "assess_trial", "status": "completed", "verdict": "sufficient", "findings": "The retained corrected selected-point artifact has 56 rows, valid original point geometry, and a plain benchmark_row_id field. The retained corrected heatmap artifact remains on the declared EPSG:6933 grid with 25000 m cells, 150000 m Gaussian smoothing behavior, and total input weight 56. This resolves the earlier delivery defect for the seaport-density result without changing the tested heatmap values.", "limitations": [ "These retained artifacts confirm the corrected final delivery behavior; the production workflow still needs execution so the final user-facing artifacts and map layer can be bound on the current map." ], "next_action": "Use this sufficient correction evidence to support the saved workflow, then execute it, inspect the final outputs, and add the heatmap layer to the map.", "question": null }, { "at": "2026-10-07T06:59:41.788574Z", "tool": "assess_result", "status": "completed", "verdict": "sufficient", "findings": "The contributing-point artifact is published and inspectable. It contains 56 original port records with original geometry and plain benchmark_row_id. A separate supporting artifact reports 7 original port records in Cuba and Venezuela as unknown because the supplied GDP table does not confirm their country eligibility under the requested rule.", "limitations": [ "The result reflects the supplied frozen benchmark seaport compilation and does not represent current port activity or current infrastructure.", "Seven potentially eligible seaport records in Cuba and Venezuela remain unknown because the supplied GDP table does not provide confirmed 2023 values for those country joins." ], "next_action": "Inspect the contributing-point and unknown-point artifacts on the map if you want record-level review of included and unknown ports.", "question": null }, { "at": "2026-10-07T07:00:13.625594Z", "tool": "assess_result", "status": "failed", "verdict": "sufficient", "findings": "The final heatmap is published and on the map. It uses 56 contributing original seaport records and the declared 25 km EPSG:6933 grid with 150000 m Gaussian smoothing. The practical limitation is that 7 original port records in Cuba and Venezuela remain unknown because the supplied GDP table does not confirm their country eligibility under the requested rule. Next action: inspect the selected-point and unknown-point artifacts if you want record-level review behind the heatmap.", "limitations": [ "The result reflects the supplied frozen benchmark seaport compilation and does not represent current port activity or current infrastructure.", "High growth here means nominal 2023 current-USD GDP per capita divided by 2018 GDP per capita; it is not inflation-adjusted growth and not total GDP growth.", "Seven potentially eligible seaport records in Cuba and Venezuela remain unknown because the supplied GDP table does not provide confirmed 2023 values for those country joins.", "The heatmap uses constant-zero exterior smoothing, so edge cells are not renormalized." ], "next_action": "Use the map layer for spatial review, or inspect the contributing-point and unknown-point artifacts to see the exact original records behind the heatmap.", "question": null }, { "at": "2026-10-07T07:01:35.006991Z", "tool": "assess_result", "status": "completed", "verdict": "sufficient", "findings": "The final heatmap is published and on the map. It uses 56 contributing original seaport records on the declared 25 km EPSG:6933 grid with 150000 m Gaussian smoothing. The main remaining limitation is that 7 original port records in Cuba and Venezuela remain unknown because the supplied GDP table does not confirm their country eligibility under the requested rule.", "limitations": [ "The result reflects the supplied frozen benchmark seaport compilation and does not represent current port activity or current infrastructure.", "High growth here means nominal 2023 current-USD GDP per capita divided by 2018 GDP per capita; it is not inflation-adjusted growth and not total GDP growth.", "Seven potentially eligible seaport records in Cuba and Venezuela remain unknown because the supplied GDP table does not provide confirmed 2023 values for those country joins.", "The heatmap uses constant-zero exterior smoothing, so edge cells are not renormalized." ], "next_action": "Use the heatmap layer for spatial review, or inspect the contributing-point and unknown-point artifacts to review the exact source records behind it.", "question": null } ] }